Comment threads on the internet tend to go down rabbit trails, circle around, disappear into other universes, and somehow fail to reach a conclusion. Sometimes this happens because there are crowds of commenters derailing the conversation, or because there is no time/word limit, and sometimes both. The purpose of a Published Dialogue is to produce a meaningful, productive conversation between two dissenters on a controversial topic by removing these aforementioned roadblocks.
The structure is as follows:
1 Introduction per participant (1500 Words)
1 Long Rebuttal per participant (1000 Words)
1 Short Rebuttal per participant (750 Words)
At this point, each participant will pose three questions to the other.
1 Three Answers post per participant (750 Words)
1 Conclusion post per participant (500 Words)
(I borrowed this format from a fellow blogger, Richard Bushey)
If you would like to participate concerning anything I’ve written, reach me through the contact form. I look forward to talking with you!
Molinism v Calvinism (Bushey/Lawson v Sommer/TurretinFan) [YouTube]
Is Evolution At Odds With Atheism? [YouTube] – subpar sound quality
Does Man Have Free Will? (Lawson/Minton v Ross/Rittenhouse) [YouTube]
Panel on Calvinism, Arminianism, and Molinism [YouTube]